<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hype Meets Reality: Silverlight Finally Reaches The Olympics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/08/11/hype-meets-reality-silverlight-finally-reaches-the-olympics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/08/11/hype-meets-reality-silverlight-finally-reaches-the-olympics/</link>
	<description>This is the blog of Brooks Andrus. Here, at irregular intervals, you may find digital noise centered around the activities of an early 21st century technologist. I work for TechSmith Corporation, but this web space and the views found on it are entirely my own.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:18:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/08/11/hype-meets-reality-silverlight-finally-reaches-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-48404</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/?p=218#comment-48404</guid>
		<description>@Phillip - I definitely didn&#039;t intend to imply that Silverlight was underwhelming because of MSNBC&#039;s implementation. There&#039;s been a lot of hype about this implementation and what it might do for the runtime&#039;s popularity, so I&#039;m just a little underwhelmed by the by the actual goods.

You&#039;re right, I think they met most of their delivery objectives--we can watch a lot of reasonable quality video from the web and that&#039;s pretty dang cool. As JD&#039;s mentioned on Twitter, their were a lot of moving parts in the Olympics coverage and we should appreciate that web video coverage has taken a big step from where it was 4 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Phillip &#8211; I definitely didn&#8217;t intend to imply that Silverlight was underwhelming because of MSNBC&#8217;s implementation. There&#8217;s been a lot of hype about this implementation and what it might do for the runtime&#8217;s popularity, so I&#8217;m just a little underwhelmed by the by the actual goods.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, I think they met most of their delivery objectives&#8211;we can watch a lot of reasonable quality video from the web and that&#8217;s pretty dang cool. As JD&#8217;s mentioned on Twitter, their were a lot of moving parts in the Olympics coverage and we should appreciate that web video coverage has taken a big step from where it was 4 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Kerman</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/08/11/hype-meets-reality-silverlight-finally-reaches-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-48403</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Kerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/?p=218#comment-48403</guid>
		<description>While your points are all pretty much on target, it seems a tad misplaced on Silverlight and not just this one implementation.  Granted, one would expect the best possible example given the opportunity--but still, it&#039;s not necessarily all that Silverlight can deliver.  I mean, what if I took any one Flash site and implied that all Flash had whatever flaws that site had?  

I agree about the video quality but I suspect this is just a matter of either (or both) bandwidth and performance.  Sure, it&#039;d be great if they could pump 1500 kbps down to a million viewers (or whatever the number is) but that&#039;s not realistic.  They probably also wanted it to work--which should always be the #1 priority--which, in this case I think they&#039;ve succeeded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While your points are all pretty much on target, it seems a tad misplaced on Silverlight and not just this one implementation.  Granted, one would expect the best possible example given the opportunity&#8211;but still, it&#8217;s not necessarily all that Silverlight can deliver.  I mean, what if I took any one Flash site and implied that all Flash had whatever flaws that site had?  </p>
<p>I agree about the video quality but I suspect this is just a matter of either (or both) bandwidth and performance.  Sure, it&#8217;d be great if they could pump 1500 kbps down to a million viewers (or whatever the number is) but that&#8217;s not realistic.  They probably also wanted it to work&#8211;which should always be the #1 priority&#8211;which, in this case I think they&#8217;ve succeeded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/08/11/hype-meets-reality-silverlight-finally-reaches-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-48391</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/?p=218#comment-48391</guid>
		<description>@MichaelM - That&#039;s a good point and yes I&#039;m guilty of bloated posts (all that rich media + a piggish WordPress theme). 

I guess the big questions is how much are consumers willing to tolerate. I know the Adobe folks have studied closely the point at which downloads tail off based on download size. What the magic number is I&#039;m not sure, but I know that 17 MB gives me pause even if its not a rational stance given how much bandwidth bloat I accept. 

People aren&#039;t necessarily rational. We often make decisions based purely on emotion and I definitely think that&#039;s something that begins to come into play as you get into the 7-10 MB range. I need to be in a &quot;must have&quot; mindset once we&#039;re over 10 MB. 

We also know that people&#039;s patience for a page load wears thin at about 7 seconds. Add 17 MB + install and your chances of keeping everyone on course gets pretty shaky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MichaelM &#8211; That&#8217;s a good point and yes I&#8217;m guilty of bloated posts (all that rich media + a piggish WordPress theme). </p>
<p>I guess the big questions is how much are consumers willing to tolerate. I know the Adobe folks have studied closely the point at which downloads tail off based on download size. What the magic number is I&#8217;m not sure, but I know that 17 MB gives me pause even if its not a rational stance given how much bandwidth bloat I accept. </p>
<p>People aren&#8217;t necessarily rational. We often make decisions based purely on emotion and I definitely think that&#8217;s something that begins to come into play as you get into the 7-10 MB range. I need to be in a &#8220;must have&#8221; mindset once we&#8217;re over 10 MB. </p>
<p>We also know that people&#8217;s patience for a page load wears thin at about 7 seconds. Add 17 MB + install and your chances of keeping everyone on course gets pretty shaky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelM</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/08/11/hype-meets-reality-silverlight-finally-reaches-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-48390</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/?p=218#comment-48390</guid>
		<description>Not to nitpick, but is 17 MB really worth complaining about?  Is it all that much for installing a platform and codec?  Lets keep it in perspective like the fact that this post chewed up 1.2 MB of bandwidth according to Safari.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to nitpick, but is 17 MB really worth complaining about?  Is it all that much for installing a platform and codec?  Lets keep it in perspective like the fact that this post chewed up 1.2 MB of bandwidth according to Safari.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/08/11/hype-meets-reality-silverlight-finally-reaches-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-48385</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/?p=218#comment-48385</guid>
		<description>@PaulH - the lack of global rights is unfortunate and ultimately its a huge opportunity lost for MS to push their runtime across the globe. The Olympics are a global event, the Silverlight runtime is what MS hopes will be a global platform--it would have made a lot of sense to get the maximum reach possible, or at least handle the consequences more gracefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@PaulH &#8211; the lack of global rights is unfortunate and ultimately its a huge opportunity lost for MS to push their runtime across the globe. The Olympics are a global event, the Silverlight runtime is what MS hopes will be a global platform&#8211;it would have made a lot of sense to get the maximum reach possible, or at least handle the consequences more gracefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulH</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/08/11/hype-meets-reality-silverlight-finally-reaches-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-48384</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/?p=218#comment-48384</guid>
		<description>i especially liked how NBC told you *after* you had downloaded &amp; installed sliverlight that you&#039;re too foreign to view these videos. the video bits kept coming up blank until NBC finally fessed up. geez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i especially liked how NBC told you *after* you had downloaded &amp; installed sliverlight that you&#8217;re too foreign to view these videos. the video bits kept coming up blank until NBC finally fessed up. geez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
