<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video Search vs Tagging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/06/19/video-search-vs-tagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/06/19/video-search-vs-tagging/</link>
	<description>This is the blog of Brooks Andrus. Here, at irregular intervals, you may find digital noise centered around the activities of an early 21st century technologist. I work for TechSmith Corporation, but this web space and the views found on it are entirely my own.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:39:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Lesperance</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/06/19/video-search-vs-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-47374</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lesperance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/06/19/video-search-vs-tagging/#comment-47374</guid>
		<description>I am stuck in the forest with you, I too donâ€™t see tagging as a game changer. The upfront work is enough to keep tagging from becoming a standard part of the online experience. Taking it a step further the fact some manual input has to be entered at all makes the results unpredictable at best. And for me, this is where tagging really falls short. Iâ€™m never sure if Iâ€™m getting an exhaustive view of any topic, even one I self tagged. 

I am far from an expert on this area, but it seems some bare minimum standard for what metadata will ride along a piece of media would be nice. Even just having the contextual metadata you mention would be an enormous step in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am stuck in the forest with you, I too donâ€™t see tagging as a game changer. The upfront work is enough to keep tagging from becoming a standard part of the online experience. Taking it a step further the fact some manual input has to be entered at all makes the results unpredictable at best. And for me, this is where tagging really falls short. Iâ€™m never sure if Iâ€™m getting an exhaustive view of any topic, even one I self tagged. </p>
<p>I am far from an expert on this area, but it seems some bare minimum standard for what metadata will ride along a piece of media would be nice. Even just having the contextual metadata you mention would be an enormous step in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

