<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Microsoft Make WPF Successful?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/05/14/can-microsoft-make-wpf-successful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/05/14/can-microsoft-make-wpf-successful/</link>
	<description>This is the blog of Brooks Andrus. Here, at irregular intervals, you may find digital noise centered around the activities of an early 21st century technologist. I work for TechSmith Corporation, but this web space and the views found on it are entirely my own.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:07:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wayne B</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/05/14/can-microsoft-make-wpf-successful/comment-page-1/#comment-50008</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/05/14/can-microsoft-make-wpf-successful/#comment-50008</guid>
		<description>&quot;MS then announced it just wasnâ€™t reasonable to rewrite all those consumer apps to leverage WPF so scratch that. Thatâ€™s two pretty big gulps if youâ€™re counting.&quot;

Do you have a citation for anything in that paragraph?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;MS then announced it just wasnâ€™t reasonable to rewrite all those consumer apps to leverage WPF so scratch that. Thatâ€™s two pretty big gulps if youâ€™re counting.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you have a citation for anything in that paragraph?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry.b</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/05/14/can-microsoft-make-wpf-successful/comment-page-1/#comment-45444</link>
		<dc:creator>barry.b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/05/14/can-microsoft-make-wpf-successful/#comment-45444</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a shame that MOSS and other Microsoft turnkey apps are getting such a run in the enterprise space. Microsoft have hit on a winning formula providing the whole box and dice - from OS through to client tool (browser), no matter how mediocre. That&#039;s a pretty big platform to move WPF and Silverlight. What can Adobe provide? just some tools? little apps? LiveCycle and it&#039;s workflows and PDF? ColdFusion and BlazeDS? Adobe wouldn&#039;t know what to do in the Enterprise space - outside their skill set.

when it comes time for pointy-haired managers to make a decision on what to purchase, the Microsoft version of &quot;nobody got sacked for buying IBM&quot; seems to apply. For them it&#039;s a no brainer. Again, what can Adobe provide?

&quot;Now the folks up in Redmond arenâ€™t idiots&quot;

your right. they&#039;re not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a shame that MOSS and other Microsoft turnkey apps are getting such a run in the enterprise space. Microsoft have hit on a winning formula providing the whole box and dice &#8211; from OS through to client tool (browser), no matter how mediocre. That&#8217;s a pretty big platform to move WPF and Silverlight. What can Adobe provide? just some tools? little apps? LiveCycle and it&#8217;s workflows and PDF? ColdFusion and BlazeDS? Adobe wouldn&#8217;t know what to do in the Enterprise space &#8211; outside their skill set.</p>
<p>when it comes time for pointy-haired managers to make a decision on what to purchase, the Microsoft version of &#8220;nobody got sacked for buying IBM&#8221; seems to apply. For them it&#8217;s a no brainer. Again, what can Adobe provide?</p>
<p>&#8220;Now the folks up in Redmond arenâ€™t idiots&#8221;</p>
<p>your right. they&#8217;re not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry.b</title>
		<link>http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/05/14/can-microsoft-make-wpf-successful/comment-page-1/#comment-45442</link>
		<dc:creator>barry.b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brooksandrus.com/blog/2008/05/14/can-microsoft-make-wpf-successful/#comment-45442</guid>
		<description>&quot;Microsoft primed its PR pump (wined and dined everyone you can imagine), rattled its saber and deployed its vanguard of tech journalists and evangelists...&quot;

was it a George Bernard Shaw quote that went &quot;there&#039;s only one thing worse than being talked about ...&quot;

&quot;..and that&#039;s *not* being talked about...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Microsoft primed its PR pump (wined and dined everyone you can imagine), rattled its saber and deployed its vanguard of tech journalists and evangelists&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>was it a George Bernard Shaw quote that went &#8220;there&#8217;s only one thing worse than being talked about &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;..and that&#8217;s *not* being talked about&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
